Skip to content

Household Absorption

Indicator Study | Active | As of 2026-04-03 | Freshness 54d

Household Absorption is 'active' with a composite score of 64.5. The hottest components are Debt-service pressure 70.7, Income strain 66.2.

64.51 Score
54 day(s) Freshness
2026-04-03 As Of

Component Scores

Component Score
Income strain 66.18
Spending strain 57.51
Debt-service pressure 70.74

Current Drivers

Driver Component Score Raw Transformed
Consumer sentiment Income strain 72.99 49.80 -53.34
Household debt service ratio Debt-service pressure 70.74 11.32 11.32
Real personal consumption expenditures Spending strain 62.55 16772.70 -1.98
Real disposable personal income Income strain 59.37 18108.70 0.13
Real retail sales Spending strain 52.48 227758.00 -1.05

Metrics

Metric Value
Score 64.51
Freshness Days 54
Panel As Of Date 2026-04-03
Source As Of Date 2026-04-01

Charts

Component contribution bars

Component contribution bars

Higher scores indicate more replacement pressure or fragility for this study.

Normalized history panel

Normalized history panel

All lines are scored on the same 0-100 scale using trailing z-scores on a weekly Friday panel.

Notes

  • Higher scores mean households are absorbing less of the shock through income and spending, and more through strain.
  • This study deliberately scores fragility, not resilience, so that it rolls cleanly into the fragility composite.
  • Mechanism note: If AI-linked disruption is becoming macro-relevant, it should eventually leak into slower real income growth, weaker spending follow-through, and tighter household cash-flow tolerance.
  • Freshness: the stalest source series in this study is 54 day(s) old.

Commentary

Household Absorption remains in an active expansion phase with a composite score of 64.5, driven by elevated debt‑service pressure (70.7) and income strain (66.2).

  • Composite score: 64.5 (54‑day freshness, panel as of 2026-04-03)
  • Debt‑service pressure component: 70.7 (highest sub‑score)
  • Income strain component: 66.2, bolstered by consumer‑sentiment driver (72.99)

Caveat: The index relies on a narrow set of drivers and may be revised; it does not fully reflect heterogeneity across households or regions.