Skip to content

Household Absorption

Indicator Study | Active | As of 2026-01-02 | Freshness 65d

Household Absorption is 'active' with a composite score of 62.6. The hottest components are Debt-service pressure 69.9, Income strain 61.8.

62.60 Score
65 day(s) Freshness
2026-01-02 As Of

Component Scores

Component Score
Income strain 61.82
Spending strain 57.16
Debt-service pressure 69.85

Current Drivers

Driver Component Score Raw Transformed
Household debt service ratio Debt-service pressure 69.85 11.26 11.26
Consumer sentiment Income strain 68.80 56.40 -56.40
Real personal consumption expenditures Spending strain 59.13 16699.50 -2.35
Real retail sales Spending strain 55.19 224606.00 -0.75
Real disposable personal income Income strain 54.85 18032.20 -0.80

Metrics

Metric Value
Score 62.60
Freshness Days 65
Panel As Of Date 2026-01-02
Source As Of Date 2026-01-01

Charts

Component contribution bars

Component contribution bars

Higher scores indicate more replacement pressure or fragility for this study.

Normalized history panel

Normalized history panel

All lines are scored on the same 0-100 scale using trailing z-scores on a weekly Friday panel.

Notes

  • Higher scores mean households are absorbing less of the shock through income and spending, and more through strain.
  • This study deliberately scores fragility, not resilience, so that it rolls cleanly into the fragility composite.
  • Mechanism note: If AI-linked disruption is becoming macro-relevant, it should eventually leak into slower real income growth, weaker spending follow-through, and tighter household cash-flow tolerance.
  • Freshness: the stalest source series in this study is 65 day(s) old.

Commentary

Household Absorption is active with a composite score of 62.6, driven by high debt‑service pressure (69.9) and moderate income strain (61.8).

  • Composite score: 62.6 (as of 2026‑01‑02; 65‑day freshness).
  • Debt‑service pressure: 69.9 – the strongest component, indicating elevated debt‑service ratios.
  • Income strain: 61.8 – still elevated, reflecting pressure on household earnings.

Caveat: The index aggregates a limited set of leading indicators and is subject to data revisions, so the composite figure should be viewed alongside broader household‑finance trends.